![]() 12/10/2015 at 13:07 • Filed to: None | ![]() | ![]() |
is that the real cylinder count or is that just how many are opperational
!!! UNKNOWN CONTENT TYPE !!!
![]() 12/10/2015 at 13:11 |
|
Could be a swap to an old Ford tractor three. Or, y’know, not.
![]() 12/10/2015 at 13:13 |
|
Or a 1.0 ecoboost *shudders*
![]() 12/10/2015 at 13:20 |
|
“Engine 3.0L V64 Cylinder”
BRUH
![]() 12/10/2015 at 13:23 |
|
Naw, man. Further down the add it clearly says “3.0 l V64”
Which makes for a displacement of less than 50 ml per individual cylinder.
![]() 12/10/2015 at 13:25 |
|
cylinders: 3 cylinders
Yeah, one under the hood and one at each of the rear wheels.
![]() 12/10/2015 at 13:30 |
|
On the other hand the top spec 1.0 ecoboost is only 5 horsepower short of the Ranger's most powerful 4 cylinder
![]() 12/10/2015 at 13:46 |
|
Maybe they were trying to go for a modern rotary pickup and threw a Mazda 20b 3-rotor wankel in it... because race truck
![]() 12/10/2015 at 13:47 |
|
Close relative of the well-known-to-CL-sellers BMW V6 family
![]() 12/10/2015 at 14:16 |
|
Came to post this. Was not disappointed.
![]() 12/11/2015 at 06:17 |
|
sounds about right.